Air Freight News

Boeing sued by Archer over alleged smears in air taxi wars

Archer Aviation Inc. sued Boeing Co., in an escalation of a feud over technology in the race to develop flying taxis.

Archer claims that it has been the victim of a smear campaign by Boeing, via its joint venture with Google co-founder Larry Page. 

Wisk Aero LLC, Boeing’s joint venture with Page’s Kitty Hawk Corp., sought “to halt the forward progress of Archer’s business with flagrantly defamatory public statements intended to destroy Archer’s reputation—including a highly publicized, intentional lie that Archer was under criminal investigation for theft of intellectual property,” the company said in the lawsuit, filed Wednesday in state court in San Jose, California. 

Boeing declined to comment on pending litigation but said it “remains committed to Wisk’s mission of driving innovation and sustainability through the future of electric air travel.”

The lawsuit is the latest round in a battle between Wisk and Archer, who have been fighting over the development of so-called eVTOL—electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft that will allow consumers to hop over traffic using battery-powered transportation. The global eVTOL market last year was valued at $8.5 billion and will climb to more than $30 billion by 2030, according to Archer. Wisk sued Archer last April, claiming the upstart had stolen its intellectual property. 

The same day the suit was filed, Wisk “launched a vicious media smear campaign aimed at mortally wounding Archer,” according to Archer’s new complaint. The attack was timed before Archer’s listing on the New York Stock Exchange and cost the company up to $1 billion, according to the suit. 

As a partner with Kitty Hawk, Boeing is liable, Archer says, and the lawsuit seeks to “hold it accountable for those wrongs.”

Archer, which originated at the University of Florida and moved to Palo Alto, California, was taken public last year through a merger with a blank-check company led by Ken Moelis. 

The case is Archer Aviation Inc. v. The Boeing Co., 22CV396479, California Superior Court, Santa Clara County (San Jose).

Bloomberg
Bloomberg

{afn_job_title}

© Bloomberg
The author’s opinion are not necessarily the opinions of the American Journal of Transportation (AJOT).

Similar Stories

Climate activists briefly disrupt Munich Airport operations

Munich Airport was closed for some hours early Saturday after climate activists accessed the runway as part of a campaign calling for more government action against greenhouse emissions.

View Article
Pakistan Airline sale bid includes global aviation groups

Pak Ethanol Pvt. said a consortium it’s leading to buy a majority stake in Pakistan’s flagship air carrier includes several global aviation firms.

View Article
Frontier Airlines breaks away from ultra low cost ticket model

Frontier Airlines, famous for deeply discounted ticket prices and bare-bones service, is adding new fare categories that include carry-on bags, seat selection and no cancellation fees as it seeks to…

View Article
https://www.ajot.com/images/uploads/article/turtle_skulls.jpg
Contraband turtle skulls, crocodile skins, kangaroo meat, exotic butterflies seized by CBP and FWS at LAX
View Article
https://www.ajot.com/images/uploads/article/United_tarmac_1.jpg
United says FAA eases flight curbs as safety review advances
View Article
https://www.ajot.com/images/uploads/article/WorldACD_-_Weekly_Report_-_wk19_2024.jpg
WorldACD Weekly Air Cargo Trends (week 19) - 2024
View Article